JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 1, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Edgar Emiro Rueda Potes

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Inaplicación para el caso por interposición de la acción antes de su vigencia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente contentivo de la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Buga –Sala Civil- para que tramite y decida en forma inmediata, toda vez que es claro que el actor interpuso esta acción antes de que se profiriera el fallo del Consejo de Estado en relación con el Decreto 1382 de 2000.

Por ello ha de darse aplicación al Art. 86 de la Constitución Política, en armonía con lo dispuesto por el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991 para que de esta acción de tutela conozca y decida el citado Tribunal, como quiera que el actor optó por interponerla en este despacho judicial.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Edgar Emiro Rueda Potes al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Buga -Sala Civil- para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.